Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Domain Change - We have moved to https://paste-and-cut.com as our new domain.
If you are using shortcuts or bookmarks for the old paste-and-cut.com.au domain, you need to update these or they will cease working from the 25th January, 2025. Please check the notice post for more details on this change to the forum.
Been following for years. First team was the Browns, then they folded for a while and become the Ravens and then Browns come back. Follow those two teams. Have also liked the 49ers since Joe was QB and Jerry Rice was WR. So I guess I follow 3 sides (2 in the one division).
Cleveland....?Damn now thats a hell of a burden to carry around being fans of thatgodforsaken franchise. I don't know if you're familiar with the writing of Bill Simmons? Anyway he's incredibly talented and here's a funny lil article on what I'm sure you've endured as a Cleveland fan. Prometheus-esque!
Sorry to say I think you're up for another season of sucking. Tough division shows no signs of letting up, PIT having rebuilt very well (atleast on the OFF side of the ball), BAL are BAL (get to that later) and CIN atleast for you have Andy Dalton at QB so guaranteed to do ok but choke at multiple critical moments (this would be a very good team with a competent QB at the helm).
CLE's QB position is still an absolute dumpster fire - and as such very little else will matter. The Manziel experiment is just the latest case of why drafting a bad QB genuinely sets your franchise back 2-3yrs (as you've got to give him time to play, suck, then rinse and repeat again BEFORE finally conceding defeat). I read an interesting book about the modern QB and what makes them - and there was a lot of stuff about Mariota, Winston and also Manziel....well the latter had a really long history of cutting corners & flying by the seat of his pants - suffice to say Brett Farve he ain't and I expect he won't be able to turn things around.
IMHO best case scenario for him is becoming a Russell Wilson type clone - BUT Manziel is unable to process his progressions or properly read defences whilst in college he could do that or hoick it to Mike Evans - that doesn't work in the pros.
BAL are great, Ozzie Smith is IMHO perhaps the best GM in football. Not a team you want to face in the playoffs - as a NE supporter I can testify to that. I've all the respect in the world for them. Great OL and front defensive 7.
The 'Niners implosion over the last season or so is really remarkable. They somehow went from the new pinup team of the league (in terms of how to draft smart & build your roster) with multiple all-pros on either side of the ball and a QB full of promise thus looking like a possible dynasty type team - to suddenly being an absolute mess! Helluva lot of bad luck BUT the combo of Harbaugh's approach wearing out it's welcome & their subsequent mishandling of him will see them rebuilding all over again.
Yup, and that CLE has managed to suck so consistently is really self-inflicted. One of the things I dislike about the draft concept is that the teams that do poorly are essentially rewarded for this by being given the best players (or atleast the right to pick what they believe are the best players FIRST!). If a team makes crap decisions at coaching/GM level etc and ends up with a bad record I don't see it being logical to give them an advantage over other teams who didn't make such mistakes. But anyway thats the system in place and to be fair the NFL draft is more than any other draft an absolute crapshoot i.e MORE picks, NOT higher picks is the best guarantee of success.
Afraid to say we'll have to disagree on Flacco. Top 5? IMHO Rodgers, Romo, Brady, Roethlisberger, Ryan, Rivers, Luck, Manning, Brees and Stafford are all superior IMHO. So yeah I think you nailed it with the 10-15 marker.
Flacco is very inconsistent, he's a bit like Eli Manning in that he's going to have a few patches or games during any given season where he just singlehandedly loses the game for his team by stinking (generally multiple picks tossed) BUT and this but applies to both of them. If they get in a purple patch of form they are almost unbeatable - and they'll both tend to have atleast one of these per season and they also have a knack for doing it at the BIGGEST moments. When Flacco is on he's tough. He does throw a great deep ball though I think he's going to really miss Torrey Smith's loss as their roster has no-one who can take the top off a defence. He's does also have the advantage of playing behind the consensus #2 OL in the league.
The MVP for BAL is Ozzie Smith - look at the players BAL has lost every other year and they have guys on their roster ALWAYS step up and fill the holes. The guy is a master of the compensatory pick system....very smart GM and I can't recall the last FA signing they stuffed up on.
BAL are a consistantly good franchise but a great franchise? To me thats very premature for a club thats only 19yrs old. The 2 SB wins in that span is very good and they're consistant winners but to me great is your GB, DAL, SF types that have half dozen plus SBs. NE is right there as they've been hands down the best team in the league over the past 20yrs.....but BAL is on the right path.
What is WRC?NFL is a sport right?
:laugh:
Sorry, the only sport I follow (semi) regularly is the WRC.
Coulda, woulda, shouldaMaybe Baltimore isn't great but they could be one dayAs for Joe Flacco, in a playoff game I would take him ahead of a lot of the guys you mentioned (especially in front of guys like Romo and a couple of the others who might fold in the big games). It does help to have a great OL. I think he is paid as a top 5-10 QB because he negotiated a new contract after he won the SuperBowl.