Yes, well you had a fair bit of 'skin' riding on them being good or not but I'm glad I heeded your sagely advice. I have that we independently came to basically the EXACT same finding does tend to add credence to my conviction. Obviously you know what they say about great minds....So glad you are happy with the soap! As I said on my SOTD review: Mike's might win the post-shave contest by a bit, but Stirling makes up for it in the glide.
You may well be right (again!) but the Plisson had to work relatively hard to get the lather just right - then again it's generally been used for CRSW soaps lately and they lather very easily - so I might have just been spoilt in that regard.As for lather building: it's very funny, but when I had only boars, Stirling was so much easier to lather for me than Mike's. Now that I know both and am used to all kinds of brushes, I wouldn't know which one is harder to lather...but then I like to overload anyway![]()
@alfredus , do you recall if your Stirling soaps had the new Shea Butter formulation? I'd imagine that being part of the ingredients would adversely affect the ease of lather, as it'd be added to 'super-fat' the mixture after the saponification process has completed i.e the lye has consumed/neutralised itself against the base fats in the mixture.
I have a sample of this and enjoy the scent a lot. I also got the sample-sized balm with the same scent. I don't recall my little puck being as soft as yours. Perhaps a formula change? (Added Shea butter didn't you say earlier?)
Yes, as stated I'd think very few gents would actively dislike the scent - I think it's SSC's most popular one - atleast going by the number of reviews posted on it.
The shea butter would definitely significantly soften the soap - hopefully this won't sound too dicky but it's a rare chance to use my soap book reading crap but if they're being really smart about it they're adding the more expensive shea butter once they've gotten 'trace' in their process (pretty sure SSC are only cold processed soaps?) - thats essentially when the lye/fat mixture starts to thicken. So the idea is that the qualities of your more expensive oils will be retained if they're not consumed by the lye saponification, hence you 'super-fat' using them at the end.
That makes the end product softer - though depending on what oils/fats you use even early one the product's end firmness will vary. But given that all my soaps are very soft - MUCH MORESO than the product when I've seen it in Youtube reviews etc - I would say it's certain that the new formula is responsible for this.
Last edited: